Search for: "J. POTTS,"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Project Lead: Maria La Ganga, Kevin Rector Design Lead: Patrick Hruby Poll Lead: David Lauter Essays: Matt Brennan, Jaclyn Cosgrove, LZ Granderson, Eva Recinos, Kevin Rector, Erika Smith Poll analysis: Hailey Branson-Potts, Matt Hamilton, Jaweed Kaleem, Kevin Rector Design: Jim Cooke, Allison Hong, Patrick Hruby, Taylor Le, Ross May Graphics: Gabrielle LaMarr LeMee, David Lauter, Hanna Sender Illustrations: Rachelle Baker, Sofie Birkin, Marcos Chin, Roche Cruchon, Michael Hoeweler, Veronica… [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:04 am
J. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Pott v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am
In a recent post, we highlighted Francis Hilliard, an author of many law books who flourished during the booming book trade of mid-19th century America. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 2:33 pm
J. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Pott v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
On Monday, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit issued an important Internet free speech opinion, NetChoice v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 12:28 pm
Next week, the Ombuds Blog will publish a ten-year retrospective.Here is the first set of stories from 2019:Retirements -- Several notable Ombuds retirements were noted last year, including:Joy Coben, University of British Columbia;Liz Lieberman, Wellesley College [retired in 2018, but not previously announced];J. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 2:44 pm
J. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 5:45 pm
However, it also includes, as Dickson J. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 4:31 pm
The Court upheld the judgment of Justice Robert J. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
Potts. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Judge Richard J. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:23 pm
Potts, 905 F.2d 367 (11th Cir. 1990). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm
Anthony 2009 Link The Law of Partnerships and Corporations, Second Edition van Duzer, J. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:35 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 7:02 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, without constituting an adverse reflection on the services provided. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:03 am
Potts, Student Intern. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 6:46 am
Potts Tara G. [read post]
