Search for: "J.L. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am
J.L. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
J.L. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am
J.L. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
J.L. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm
The majority opinion was written by Judge Jones, and was joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Southwick, Haynes, Costa, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
Smith reviewed ME CDC outbreak investigation documents. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
Thomas Colby has made a version of this argument, and a similar argument has been advanced by Peter Smith. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm
Survival of enteric pathogens had been established in earlier by Smith and Palumbo (1975) but ignored by both the industry and USDA. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am
Smith, Religious Organizations and the Law (November 2021 Update). 8. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
[A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.] [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
Roberts-Smith is suing the Age, Sydney Morning Herald and Canberra Times for defamation relating to a series of reports published in 2018 that alleged he committed war crimes. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
J.L. (2000), see also McIntyre v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
, 29 J.L. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Benfer (Wake Forest University), J.L. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm
Has Business Left Milton Friedman Behind? [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Helen Norton, The Government's Speech and the Constitution (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Frederick SchauerFor well over a decade, Helen Norton has been our leading scholar of the constitutional questions surrounding speech by the government. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:54 am
Div. of J.L. [read post]
