Search for: "JAMES, Officer, Official Capacity"
Results 1 - 20
of 484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
In the following guest post, James L. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
The court provides some attempted guardrails, including how the government official’s account self-identifies: Had Freed’s account carried a label (e.g., “this is the personal page of James R. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The Court explained that the first statement “is state action taken in his official capacity as school board president;” while “the latter is private action taken in his personal capacity as a friend and neighbor. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:26 am
" The question of whether citizens may record telephone conversations with police officers acting in their official capacities appears to be an issue of first impression. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
In reaching its decision, the appeals court held that a public official engages in state action only when the official performs a legally mandated “duty of his office” or invokes the “authority of his office. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
U.S. military officials past and presenthave been wary of involvement by the federal armed forces in policing their own citizens. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 4:54 am
Russian defense officials claimed they intercepted 44 drones, and that only a power substation was damaged. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
But when a public official posts in their official capacity, the poster must respect the First Amendment’s limitations placed on government. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:18 am
Had Freed's account carried a label (e.g., "this is the personal page of James R. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
In this episode you’ll learn about: How a lot of the worrisome online content that critics blame on Section 230 is actually protected by the First Amendment Requiring intelligence and law enforcement agencies to get warrants before obtaining Americans’ private telecommunications data Why “foreign” is the most important word in “Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act” Making government officials understand national security… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
The New York Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) has expressed the view that local governments "and their officers lack capacity to mount constitutional challenges to acts of the State and State legislation. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
The court found no legal basis for President Trump’s assertion that he had acted in an “official” capacity while engaging in alleged election interference that would entitle him to executive immunity. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In my view, Kavanagh’s “mediated majoritarianism” is clearly related to James Madison's understanding of democracy. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
But the Office of Congressional Ethics dismissed a complaint filed against Bush last fall alleging her campaign’s employment of Merritts was a violation of federal election law. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
Inside ICOM’s Red List for China, which informs custom officers of what at-risk antiquities look likeWhere are the Artifacts Going? [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
More than 1000 people have been federally charged with a variety of crimes, ranging from assaulting officers and destruction of property to obstructing an official proceeding and seditious conspiracy. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
At least 16 other states have pending legal challenges to Trump’s eligibility for office under the 14th Amendment. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
United States, the Supreme Court held that bribery requires performance of, or a promise to perform, some “official act,” which it defined as a decision or action on a matter within an officer’s official capacity. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
District Court Judge James Boasberg had reasoned the Foreign Agent Registration Act only applies to ongoing violations and years had passed since Wynn was required to file a statement. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
All nine justices seemed to acknowledge the challenge and importance of defining when government employees are acting in an official capacity online, and therefore bound by First Amendment restrictions on censorship; and when they are acting as private citizens, with their own individual free speech rights. [read post]
