Search for: "JAS v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
The first and most important of those decisions is Ja’Chim Scheuing v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
The plaintiff states in this case (like the ones in Biden v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
With Monday’s oral arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:54 am
And in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
” Examining the Harvard Law School’s compendium of Article 51 letters, it is clear that although a number of states had filed Article 51 letters in which they cited both state and non-state actor threats, relatively few states had exclusively cited non-state actor threats in Article 51 letters filed before 2001. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 12:26 am
The prohibition came before Queensland’s State Court of Appeal in Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156, in which Ms Kamaljit Kaur Athwal argued that the ban was discriminatory. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:34 am
Club Exploria, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
JA. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:39 am
Ja es, 2023 Ga. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) handed down judgment in Credit Europe Bank N.V v The Admiralty Fund Comprising the proceeds of the sale of the mv Tarik III & Others on 13 October 2022. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
In the recent Court of Appeal decision in Kosteckyj v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
JAS Family Trust v Oceana Holding Corp., 109 AD3d 639; Matter of Niggli v Richlin Mach., 257 AD2d 623; Matter of Marcato, 102 AD2d 826). [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
Bhd. and its affiliate Vina Cell Technology Company Limited and Vina Solar Technology Company Limited; JA Solar (Malaysia) Co., Ltd. or JA Solar Malaysia Sdn. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
See State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 9:02 am
Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:26 am
One has seen how that is now being developed using the mechanisms of private law in OECD Specific Instance applications against enterprises ealleged to have breached their responsibility (markets driven private law based) and to that extent extra legal as a function of domestic legal orders) through acts of complicity in fragile states, conflict zones, or in cooperating with states whose own views of human rights ans sustainability are incompatible with those of the home… [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4 The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States District Court… [read post]
