Search for: "JIMENEZ v. DUKE"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2016, 12:33 pm
See Leyva, 716 F.3d at 514 (holding that “the presence of individualized damages cannot, by itself, defeat class certification under Rule 23(b)(3)”); Jimenez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
” As Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Jimenez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
The appeals court noted that Allstate would have the opportunity to raise any individualized defenses at the damages phase (Jimenez v Allstate Insurance Co, September 3, 2014, Gould, R). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
” (Jimenez, supra, 2012 WL 1366052, *8.) [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:38 am
See Jimenez v. [read post]