Search for: "JOHN/JANE DOES A THROUGH D"
Results 1 - 20
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
In 2011, she broke the stories of the Jane Does who were accusing Jeffrey Epstein of child sex trafficking. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Ultimately, plaintiffs’ expert witnesses would have to show that the mechanism was real by showing that silicone exposure causes autoimmune disease through epidemiologic studies, One of the more persistent purveyors of a “test” for detecting alleged silicone sensitivity came from Smalley and Shanklin, then at the University of Tennessee. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
CLAIMANT’S VERIFIED MOTION FOR SUMMARY FINAL ORDER WITH REGARD TO SECTION 440.13(2)(f) REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF PHYSICIAN Claimant, JANE DOE, by and through her undersigned attorney, files this, Claimant’s Verified Motion for Summary Final Order. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
John & Jane Parents 1 v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
The Court explained that even speech designed to prompt others to act through "social pressure and the 'threat' of social ostracism …. does not lose its protected character … simply because it may embarrass others or coerce them into action. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
The Complaint identifies the Parties with pseudonyms—"John Doe" for Plaintiff and "Jane Roe" for Defendant…. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm
It has been a pretty crazy time, I’d like to think that it was the panel that evident I did it ILTA that causes national awareness of, of AI in these Large Language Models. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
(D. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
I thought I'd pass along a long excerpt from this amicus brief, which my students Samantha Frazier, Katelyn Taira, and Jacob Haas and I wrote on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition and myself; for more on the decision below, which indeed rejected pseudonymity, see here. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
John Fetterman Sponsored a Bill from the Hospital. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Labor leaders say Norfolk Southern resists proposed regulation, opposing new safety standards while searching for loopholes through existing rules. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:37 pm
But the appointment does not require members to divest their own personal biotech investments. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Indeed, even if a law school does want to say that one side is correct—again, something I'd recommend against, for reasons given in the University of Chicago's Kalven Report[1]—it can do so, while still stressing that it's important for people to hear both sides: Come hear John Peters and Jane Williams debate immigration policy! [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:06 am
PN4883.G75 2019 Griffith, Jane. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:13 am
Bennie Thompson (D-MS) said. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 5:17 am
[D.] [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:31 pm
Through the preparation of the preliminary report, DU rejected John's request to interview any of his proposed witnesses. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm
Premier Rehab Keller authored by Supreme Court Justice John Roberts. [read post]
