Search for: "JOHN BARRETT" Results 1 - 20 of 1,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 9:55 am by Amy Howe
In a 22-page opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, Thomas explained that when the Constitution was ratified in the late 18th century, “appropriations were understood as a legislative means of authorizing expenditure from a source of public funds for designated purposes. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court Temporarily Suspends Trump Lawyer John Eastman’s Law License MSN – Maegan Vazquez (Washington Post) | Published: 5/4/2024 The District of Columbia Court of Appeals suspended John Eastman’s law license after a similar decision in California, which did so over his role in a legal strategy to help Donald Trump stay in power after his 2020 election loss. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:51 am by Albert W. Alschuler
John Sauer, championed this formulation, and at least one Supreme Court justice—Brett Kavanaugh—appeared to embrace it. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:54 pm by Howard Bashman
“How Justice Amy Coney Barrett drove the Supreme Court’s debate on abortion and Trump immunity”: John Fritze of CNN has this report. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:39 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Clarence Thomas posed the first question to Trump’s attorney John D. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:53 am by Beatrice Yahia
Marimow reports for the Washington Post; John Fritze, Tierney Sneed, and Marshall Cohen report for CNN. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
Kavanaugh asked John Sauer, Trump's counsel, if "a clear statement in the statute covering the president" is required "if the president's official acts are going to be criminalized. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
John Sauer, encourages the Court to see far beyond Trump to the true horror of criminally prosecuting ex-Presidents:The implications of the Court's decision here extend far beyond the facts of this case. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett was less persuaded by this argument. [read post]
Justice Amy Coney Barrett also asked how the Idaho law would impact a woman in this scenario. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
Some of them, like Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, focused on how the law would actually operate in practice under Turner’s description. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm by Whitney Hodges
The unanimous opinion, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, found “[n]othing in constitutional text, history or precedent supports exempting legislatures from ordinary takings rules. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, seemed to suggest that because someone who is homeless can instantly become “not homeless,” homelessness is not a status. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:17 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined with the court’s three liberal members to form the majority. [read post]