Search for: "JOHN DOE 1 V DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS" Results 1 - 20 of 511
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§11–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by John Elwood
During those protests, a police officer known by the pseudonym John Doe was struck by a hard object and badly injured. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm by Josh Blackman
The first oaths statute does not expressly impose a statute on the Vice President, but it does expressly impose an oath on the President of the Senate. 1 Stat. 23, Sects 1-2. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
In other words, the Department of Commerce does not have the sort of rulemaking power that the EPA was given in the Clean Air Act and that was expressly exercised in writing the regulations sustained in Chevron. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
This extension will be provided automatically and does not require a request by disputing parties. [read post]