Search for: "JOHN DOE APPEL" Results 1 - 20 of 3,343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 10:07 am by Julian Ellis and Eric Gill
April 11, 2024), this case involves appellate review of a district court’s findings regarding patent obviousness and infringement in Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 5:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
The May 29, 2024, Order In a brief May 29, 2024, order, District of Delaware Bankruptcy Court Judge John T. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:29 am by Dennis Crouch
  Respondents were represented by John Dawson, Justin Hein and Kristin Mattiske-Nicholls of Carle Mackie Power & Ross LLP, with Dawson conducting oral arguments. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Why does the often highly critical mainstream media routinely fail to question the basic competence and fundamental integrity of the judges? [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
The appellants get their costs throughout. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
John Smyth review On 14 May, the Church of England announced a further delay in the John Smyth review. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Watchdog groups were disappointed, saying the measure does not go far enough after the city council watered down a proposal that had included more sweeping changes, such as giving the volunteer Ethics Commission unilateral power to put items on the ballot. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
The PREP Act does not explicitly mention patent law issues or intellectual property rights, but does create immunity for typical patent actions such as manufacture and distribution. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
However, the error does not affect the overall conclusion that the appellant did not meet his onus to show there are grounds to believe that the defence had no prospect of success. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew A. Seligman
Some challenging questions might arise with respect to such cases—for example, whether the constitutional prohibition on such prosecutions is properly categorized as an “immunity” and thus entitled to pre-trial appellate review—but that detail should not significantly affect Trump’s case. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:54 am
The Director did so and then filed a motion for remand, asserting that: The TTAB's decision does not provide complete factual findings as to whether the personal training services in Appellant's registrations and the goods in ERB's application are related under the second DuPont factor. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Xu, written by Judge John Lee and joined by Judges Diane Wood and Doris Pryor: Appellants Xingjian Sun and Xing Zhao accused their professor, Appellee Gary Gang Xu, of sexually and emotionally abusing them while the two were students at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
With specious legal reasoning, the Arizona court’s 4-2 majority decision led by Justice John Lopez IV centered on ambiguities the court found in the 2022 statute. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:46 am by Yosi Yahoudai
“If someone does this once or twice, it’s likely they’ve done it a lot of times,” Medwed said. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The April 8, 2024, Opinion In an opinion marked “Not Recommended for Publication” and written by Judge John K. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm by Whitney Hodges
The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the California appellate court to be resolved in accordance with this holding. [read post]