Search for: "JOHN DOES, I-V" Results 1 - 20 of 8,343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Evan George
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:30 am by Daniele Durkin
  The creators of this genAI technology were also included as John Doe defendants in the suit. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Neil Siegel
Robert Cooter and I expanded the scope of analysis from the Interstate Commerce Clause to Article I, Section 8. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:58 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
This could be done by providing evidence that the practice: (i) does not materially degrade or threaten to materially degrade the BIAS of the general public; (ii) does not hinder consumer choice; (iii) does not impair competition, innovation, consumer demands, or investment; and (iv) does not impede any forms of expression, types of service, or points of view. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Does "landscaping" include installing an in-ground trampoline? [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:10 pm by Brett Trout
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 US 1 (S. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
We therefore conclude that the Bureau’s funding mechanism does not violate the Appropriations Clause. [read post]
22 May 2024, 2:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
App. 2000))… After reviewing the evidence as a whole, the chancellor noted that John has been taking V.G. to the same church for years and that Tiffany stated she "does not attend church now, as I don't feel it is required. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Key Takeaway Unlike the 2016 rules, the Final Rule does not contain a specific, representation-based exception from fiduciary advice for interactions with sophisticated counterparties like other advice fiduciaries. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am by Ilya Somin
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
Defendant: Look, sure, I was just convicted of drug trafficking, and, yes, I testified that I deposited all my legitimate income in the bank while I kept all my drug-trafficking money in cash, and, okay, you found a bunch of cash in my house near my drugs and my scale and my notebooks meticulously documenting my drug-trafficking transactions, but that doesn't prove the cash is the proceeds of drug trafficking. [read post]