Search for: "JOHN MONTGOMERY V DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 4:59 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The defendant, not content to stop there, also began sending emails to the Montgomery County Police Department alerting them to “narcotics activity” at the bar. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/29/07 referred to codesLAW / CORRECTNSA3787 Gottfried (MS) -- Provides for review by the department of health of policies and practices regarding HIV, AIDS and HCV at correctional facilitiesSUMM : Amd S206, Pub Health L Authorizes and directs the department of health to review any policy or practice instituted in facilities operated by the department of correctional services and in local correctional facilities… [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:53 am
Report run on 3/9/3007 Categories Included: Corrections, Criminal Procedure Law, Death Penalty, Judiciary Law and Penal Law. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:36 am
. Categories Included: Corrections Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Judiciary Law Penal Law. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
After Vincent John Zahorik was convicted of “making a false report to a police officer or law enforcement agency,” he appealed. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews the first relists of 2019. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  Prior to his current position, he states he was a Vice President in the Portfolio Retention Department at Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, and prior to that he says he was Vice President of Loan Services at World Savings Bank, FSB. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, the Supreme Court is conferring this very day about whether to take up Baker v. [read post]