Search for: "JONES v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:53 am
In the case Jones v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:55 am
The SCA referred to Jones v Krok [1994] ZASCA 177 as the leading authority on the enforceability of foreign judgments. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
By: Laurie E. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:15 am
In Howard Jones Investments, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am
ABC Corporation and Jones v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
I still haven’t blogged last year’s In re Social Media Addiction rulings from the California federal and state courts. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm
One case highlighted is Gbarabe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:20 pm
Patricia Jones Penn is on the St. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
In a similar case, California refused to place the name of a 27-year-old presidential candidate on its primary election ballot, and the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
In a similar case, California refused to place the name of a 27-year-old presidential candidate on its primary election ballot, and the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am
The rationale for the “meet and confer” requirement was discussed in depth in the NPD of Jones (Robert) v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Jones, concurring: But we were wrong! [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm
Jones v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From Luo v. [read post]