Search for: "JONES v. POOLE"
Results 1 - 20
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm
In that case it was argued that the composite visual frames of a coin-operated pool game called ‘Pocket Money’ were artistic works, but Kitchin J left open whether they were created by the relevant artist and programmer Mr Jones, or were created by the computer program which he wrote (paragraph 104). [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in SFFA v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kevin Kelly and his girlfriend Regina Jones went to a Halloween party at the Rustic Café in Old Lyme, Connecticut into 2018. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:16 am
Courts use that standard to determine whether an affidavit justifies a search or seizure because there is probable cause to believe that the subject committed a crime.In Illinois v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, in Frank v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm
Jones. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:50 am
As a reminder… ‘Obvious & gross’ In the case of Wachtel v Wachtel [1973], the issue of conduct was considered by the family court and further summarised by Lady Hale in Miller [2006] as follows:“[…] once the assets are seen as a pool, and the couple as equal partners, then it is only equitable to take their conduct into account if one has been very much more to blame than the other: in the famous words of Ormrod J in Wachtel v Wachtel… [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
And news organizations litigated landmark cases, like New York Times Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Jones, mocking Justice Scalia's efforts to figure out what the framers would have [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm
Investors and Regulators Are Still Flushing Out ESG Implications The pool of investors is getting broader as new avenues for companies to access the public capital markets are paved and consumer-friendly tech platforms enable easy and instant on-line stock trading for retail players. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 11:09 pm
The answer is Bob Jones v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
., LP v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
But a number of the most controversial content moderation decisions made by Facebook in recent years have been decisions to leave content up, not take it down: Think of the Nancy Pelosi cheapfake video in which footage of the speaker of the House was edited misleadingly so that she appeared intoxicated, or hate speech in Myanmar, or the years that Facebook hosted content from Infowars chief Alex Jones before finally deciding to follow Apple’s lead and remove Jones’s… [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
Jones made the comments at the hearing of a man accused of launching a homophobic attack on him in a pub last year. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
The executive official privilege was first established in Tennessee by the Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
