Search for: "JORDAN v. BROWN"
Results 1 - 20
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
He covered topics like judicial vacancies, the need for Jordan timelines, and disinformation circulated about the Court’s R v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
The Committee typically met 2-4 times yearly and was apparently content, until the pandemic struck, to continue in place with rules dating from the Victorian era (though in fairness to Committee Members and per Justice Brown, six ‘tweaks’ had been made since 1881[29]). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Hensley v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:45 pm
Even though Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:42 pm
Roberts then announces that he has Biden v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
in Illinois v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
Barbara Jordan Barbara Jordan speaking at the Democratic National Convention in July 1976. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Barbara Jordan Barbara Jordan attended Boston University Law School, where she became the first Black graduate in 1959. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
In the case Brown v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Trump, and others discussed taking to social media to encourage Trump supporters to march to the Capitol on Jan. 6. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
Not to dissenting Judges Jordan, Branch, Grant, and Brasher. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Brown, Alex Engler, and Henry Claypool to discuss how people with disabilities are impacted by current technology and legislation on this issue: Loren DeJonge Schulman discussed Schedule F, a Trump administration federal workforce policy, and its potential implications on national security. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Safdar, 2021 ONCA 207; 2022 SCC 21 (39629) Brown J.: “The appellant, Syed Adeel Safdar, was tried for offences related to the abuse of his wife. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am
Brown, 2022 SCC 18, released concurrently, concludes that s. 33.1 violates the Charter and is of no force or effect pursuant to s. 52(1). [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
