Search for: "JUSTICE v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 65,311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech and struck a blow against government censorship-by-proxy yesterday in NRA v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in cert denial news, we are sad that the Supreme Court will not take up Pollreis v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
Justice Neil Gorsuch filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of cert, arguing that the court’s 1970 decision in Williams v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:41 am by LII Team
But since Chief Justice Earl Warren read the unanimous decision in its entirety, Brown v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am by David Oxenford
  (Note that there have been statements from some Supreme Court justices that suggest that this standard that arose in a case, NY Times v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:51 am by Kelly Bachich Sheehan
In the 2012 United States Supreme Court case National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:06 am by Melanie O'Brien
The ICJ CERD Cases Two cases brought under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), Armenia v Azerbaijan and Azerbaijan v Armenia, are relevant, both of which center on Nagorno-Karabakh. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On May 23, 2024, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:36 pm by Chris Rufo | New England Law, US
Justice Sotomayor expanded on the decision in Bantam Books, Inc., which stated the First Amendment does not permit government officials to use the “threat of invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion…to achieve the suppression [of disfavored speech]. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:50 pm by Amy Howe
Applying the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:50 am by Amy Howe
And in reaching the contrary conclusion, she wrote, the court of appeals misapplied the framework outlined in the court’s 1963 decision in Bantam Books v. [read post]
While the defense argued that the defendants were not guilty of subversion as subverting state power involves the use or threat of force, the court referenced HKSAR v. [read post]