Search for: "Jackson v. Martin" Results 1 - 20 of 304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
A third interim order was made in March 2021 after a contested application by the father to have the child returned to Chilliwack (SZM v KMN, 2021 BCSC 365 (CanLII), (which was decided before Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (CanLII), more on the significance of this case below)). [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Her dissertation title is, however, as Martin Short would say, a bit of a tell. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:07 am by Unreported Opinions
On August 31, 2021, following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Cecil County, the court found Martin Edward Goodwin, Jr., appellant, guilty of firstd-egree and […] The post MARTIN EDWARD GOODWIN, JR. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
City of Philadelphia (Injury in fact standing doctrine) Martin v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Guest Author
The President would not need to justify his action solely on inherent executive authority, though the argument would doubtless partake of Jackson’s zones in Youngstown.[22] The President might also argue that he has an implicit authorization to honor commitments in [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
He was just six years old when the Court decided Brown v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
Given that the nutty wing of the Originalist camp now in the SCOTUS ascendency had no problem in reversing one landmark precedent (when they overruled Roe v Wade 410 US 113 (1973) in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization 597 US __ (2022) (Opinion pdf | Cornell | Justia | SCOTUSblog)), they will doubtless have little compunction in doing so again if they decided that Sullivan too was egregiously… [read post]