Search for: "Jackson v. Thompson" Results 1 - 20 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 4:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Absent a confidential or fiduciary relationship, there is no duty to disclose, and meresilence, without identifying some act of deception, does not constitute a concealment actionable as fraud” (NYCTL 1999-1 Trust v 573 Jackson Ave. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Jackson and Yasmin Dawood, eds., Constitutionalism and a Right to Effective Government? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Thompson, 403 U.S. 217 (1971), in which the Court infamously allowed Jackson, Mississippi to close all of its public swimming pools in the face of a desegregation order. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thompson, 403 U.S. 217 (1971), in which the Court infamously allowed Jackson, Mississippi to close all of its public swimming pools in the face of a desegregation order. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The event was moderated by Ralph Richard Banks, the Jackson Eli Reynolds Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Stanford Center for Racial Justice, along with the following Stanford Law faculty panelists: Easha Anand, Assistant Professor and Co-Director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic; Richard Thompson Ford, George E. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
” Alito, joined by Thomas, also penned a statement regarding the denial of review in Thompson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Update: Over at The Jackson List, John Q Barrett notes the passing of Benjamin B. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:44 am by Steve Lubet
Curtis also contradicted Frankfurter (again, without mentioning him) when discussing William Thompson, the prior counsel for Sacco and Vanzetti. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Sotomayor hit on one aspect of the problem with Thompson's argument when she referred to the "legal morass" entailed by distinguishing substantive from procedural rules, but the case she cited, Mistretta v. [read post]