Search for: "Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
Pyett, 556 U.S. 247 (2009); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
” In Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
5 Key Trends In Workplace Class Action Litigation For 2019: The Impact Of U.S. Supreme Court Rulings
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am
The 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Reyes, 272 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Tex. 2008) (noting that, by enacting the TCHRA, the Texas Legislature "intended to correlate state law with federal law in employment discrimination cases") (quoting Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
The 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Mayes, 236 S.W.3d 754, 755 (Tex. 2007) (per curiam); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
City of Jackson, supra.The opinion goes on to explain that[a]lso on January 26, 2015, Plaintiff went to work at the Casey's General Store in Fruitland, Missouri, a township just outside of the City of Jackson. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Two employees of a nearby Wal-Mart saw the men leave the McDonald's. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
” Professor Seiner’s main argument is that issue class actions would work particularly well for Title VII class actions, especially in the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Co., supra (quoting Jackson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
In agreeing to hear Tyson’s case, the Court took no action on a pair of petitions raising similar issues, by the huge retail chain, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
The Southern District of Alabama found (Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, March 26, 2013) that any employee’s use of the n-word was “patently offensive,” but an “isolated utterance on a single occasion,” not directed at anyone in the workplace, was a stray remark that failed to meet the legal threshold for a cognizable Title VII claim. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm
With an eye to the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, the court determined that the plaintiffs could not show anything more than a uniform policy by Hearst of utilizing unpaid internships. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm
Although it's always a perilous enterprise to predict where SCOTUS is going, I have some difficulty picturing the Supreme Court that decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
