Search for: "Jacobellis v. Ohio"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained in Jacobellis… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained in Jacobellis… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:49 am
That lunacy was summed up in the ridiculous statement of Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:03 am
" Jacobellis v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” That leaves any potential censorship based on the ridiculous standard which Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart advanced for pornography in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
One of his more well-known opinions was in the obscenity case Jacobellis v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 4:51 am
It appears to follow Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s test for pornography in his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 8:15 am
” Tamalunis v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:25 am
Supreme Court’s decision in the 1964 free speech case Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 12:12 pm
" Jacobellis v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 4:50 am
Ohio (1964), “I know it when I see it. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
” In the 1964 landmark case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:30 am
If you are a federal prosecutor, you know not to interfere in an election. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm
Whatever happens with police reform legislation in Congress, there is no reason to expect that protection of reporters and media will figure into the proposed “best practices” of how journalists should be treated during tense and often violent situations such as we’ve seen in the past month. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am
One of the fascinating questions raised by the United States Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Ohio. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:32 pm
” Jacobellis v. [read post]