Search for: "Jacoby v. Jacoby "
Results 1 - 20
of 234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson v… [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am
Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher, 115 AD3d 600, 601 [1st Dept 2014] [allegations that client was excessively billed and then threatened and coerced into paying the excessive and overinflated fees did not establish the “existence of a chronic and/or extreme pattern of legal delinquency”]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 2014 WL 3421053 at *5 [Sup. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:28 pm
Former GuestKat Jan Jacobi and Katfriend Jarieked Timmerman commented on a recent ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court on the concepts of ‘due cause’ and honest practices.Other newsHayleigh Bosher invited the IPKat readers to vote for the IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2023. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Marcel Pemsel analysed the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 6:10 am
He then recalled the principle affirmed by the CJEU on the intention of use when applying for a trade mark registration.The panel then discussed Sky v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:26 am
Last year, former GuestKat Jan Jacobi reported both the Warsaw District Court’s Referral to the CJEU and AG Rantos’ Opinion on the TB v Castorama Polska and Knor litigation (see IPKat posts here and here). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:15 am
In one of the cases, Vitra v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 8:55 am
This permissiveness includes reading down the Supreme Court’s sole precedent protective of juvenile suspects, J.D.B. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:14 am
Jacoby (9th Cir. 2002) concluded that the Act applies to access to public address systems, even though that's not literally a "meeting," though Herdahl v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:39 pm
GuestKat Jan Jacobi wrote a post on two recent decisions by the Dutch courts (Jaguar Land Rover v Ineos and Vitra v Kwantum) with diverging approaches to Article 2(7). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:04 am
Here is the abstract: In Samson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 2:04 am
Background and analysis on this is provided by our GuestKat Rose Hughes (see here).DESIGNGuestKat Jan Jacobi reported on the UK Government's response to the consultation on design law, as a result of which the government announced that it had joined the Global Brands Database provided by WIPO. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 8:40 am
Georg Jacoby and Dr. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 9:49 am
For more details on this case, please refer to the report (here) written by GuestKats Becky Knott and Jan Jacobi. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 2:06 am
By GuestKats Becky Knott and Jan Jacobi. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
Upsolve, at 16 (quoting from Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:59 pm
This question was recently answered in a judgment of the CJEU in Case C-183/21 (Globus v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:34 pm
Jacoby v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 5:05 am
From yesterday's decision in Jacoby v. [read post]
