Search for: "James Doe,86" Results 1 - 20 of 224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 9:38 am by centerforartlaw
The photograph, one of a human skull, in combination with the fact that Mann has stated that “[the bodies] were a scientific experiment” and “[she] grew to see them that way,” is meant to provide scientists with information about the bone structure of individuals who have experienced various forms of trauma after death.[8] As a result, the observation and voyeurism associated with looking at the dead body, in this circumstance, is balanced by the scholarly outcome and… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
These are not secret analyses; they are public documents for the whole world to see.[4] Even parties that argue in court that their conduct does not implicate the federal securities laws have themselves used the Howey framework internally for years to evaluate crypto offerings.[5] Of course, that doesn’t mean that all crypto products are offered as “investment contracts” and are therefore securities. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Boards should be thorough in documenting their consideration and oversight of these opportunities and the corresponding risks – while latitude is given to companies exercising business judgment in good faith, it can be more challenging to defend decision-making when the paper record does not reflect all of the care taken by the leadership. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
James Cleith Phillips, Brigham Young University, is publishing A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of "Possessions" in American English, 1760-1776 in the Chapman Law Review. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:47 am by Christine Corcos
James Cleith Phillips, Brigham Young University, is publishing A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of "Possessions" in American English, 1760-1776 in the Chapman Law Review. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
Tunisian public opinion holds the same conviction with an overwhelming 86%. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
On remand, my friend Ilan Wurman, law professor at Arizona State, pushed the Appointments Clause argument (among others), but his arguments were rejected by District Judge James Wesley Hendrix; this appeal follows. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
When Congress proposed the Equal Rights Amendment in 1972, it specified in its joint resolution (86 Stat. 1523), agreed to by two-thirds of each House, that the ERA would become valid "when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
  Judge Lock referred the motion to another judge, James Floyd Ammons, Jr., who denied it. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Regardless of how many cases are cited (and there are many possible “precedents”), the true parameter does not have a 95% probability of lying within the interval given by a given 95% confidence interval.[9] Similarly, as much as judges would like p-values and confidence intervals to eliminate the need to worry about systematic error, their saying so cannot make it so.[10] Even a mighty federal judge cannot make the p-value probability, or its complement, substitute for the… [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:49 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The APR noted that – thanks to its efforts to transition to digital records – the EEOC had a historically low number of only 86 overdue FOIA requests in FY 2022. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:03 am by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
Goliath (2016 to 2021) Goliath does not glamourize the legal industry but rather brings to light its imperfections and injustice. [read post]