Search for: "James L. Harper v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am by centerforartlaw
By James Parker The Supreme Court waited 27 years after deciding the 1994 landmark case of Cambell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am by centerforartlaw
By James Parker The Supreme Court waited 27 years after deciding the 1994 landmark case of Cambell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:15 am by Tess Graham
Under Secretary of State Nuland on Accelerating Aid to Ukraine and Sanctions Against Russiaby Viola Gienger (@ViolaGienger) (March 9, 2022) Humanitarian Corridors in Ukraine: Impasse, Ploy or Narrow Passage of Hope? [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:25 pm by Howard Bashman
” And Hannah Knowles and María Luisa Paúl of The Washington Post have an article headlined “Abortion bans and sanctuary plans: States are preparing for a possible future without Roe v Wade. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
 Rooming House Act did not apply to Assisted Living Facility here ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, by and through BRIAN BURNS, EXECUTOR,v CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC d/b/a CARE ONE HARMONY VILLAGE AT MOORESTOWN and CARE ONE, LLC,SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm by admin
James Webber In the Lanzo case, plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, James Webber and Jacqueline Moline, both opined that non-asbestiform minerals can cause mesothelioma. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
With respect to data security, there are few more useful and concise statements than the “Charney Theorem,” which states: “there’s always a percentage of the population up to no good. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]