Search for: "James W Baker" Results 1 - 20 of 266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Lay juries usually function well in assessing the relevance of an expert witness’s credentials, experience, command of the facts, likeability, physical demeanor, confidence, and ability to communicate. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:51 am by fjhinojosa
Baker, A Survey of the Literature on Federal Appellate Practice and Procedure, 18 FUI L. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
By Yousuf Syed Khan (@yousufsyedkhan) (October 17, 2023) Expert Guidance: Law of Armed Conflict in the Israel-Hamas WarBy Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw), Michael W. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am by fjhinojosa
James’ article The African-American Church, Political Activity, and Tax Exemption is cited in the following book: W. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am by fjhinojosa
Jame Baker’s article Beyond the Information Age: The Duty of Technology Competence in the Algorithmic Society was cited in the following article: John G. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Instead, it was a statement by James Baker, then a spokesman for Republican presidential candidate George W. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Anilya Krishnan
Baker of the University of Oklahoma College of Law and James W. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 2:23 pm by William Appleton
Mankin and Christopher W. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[W]hether two activities are comparable for purposes of the Free Exercise Clause must be judged against the asserted government interest that justifies the regulation at issue. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:34 am by jonathanturley
His name as you may know is James Baker, and he was the top attorney who reviewed the fraudulent anti-Trump FISA wiretap warrants for probable cause. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 20 July 2022, the Government published its Response to the Call for Evidence on Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation [pdf]. [read post]
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]