Search for: "Jane Does 1-30" Results 1 - 20 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Jan. 5, Jan. 12, Jan. 19, Feb. 16, Feb. 23, Mar. 1, Mar. 15, Mar. 22, Mar. 28, Apr. 12, Apr. 19, Apr. 26, May 9, May 16, May 23 and May 30 conferences) L.W. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Because the district court entered a default judgment on liability, we treat it as conclusively established that Cenk Sidar raped Jane Doe in London in September 2017. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am by Josh Blackman
" In other words, the Court limited the injunction to the two minor Plaintiffs: Pam Poe and Jane Doe. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
When the Supreme Court decided the Daubert case in June 1993, two recent verdicts in silicone-gel breast implant cases were fresh in memory.[1] The verdicts were large by the standards of the time, and the evidence presented for the claims that silicone caused autoimmune disease was extremely weak. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bartole has sued Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 for monetary damages and injunctive relief. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm by NARF
(Indian Child Welfare Act) In the Matter of Jane Doe I (Indian Child Welfare Act) Rivera v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:46 am by Steven Gallagher
Jane Doe’s deadline to pay the arbitrator’s fee was October 3, 2022 (30 days after the September 1, 2022, due date). [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 12:39 pm by centerforartlaw
However, this does not sound like an exceptional museum setting, rather it subscribes to conventional and well-proven methods that curators worldwide use commonly. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 pm by Ryan Goodman
The apparently inadvertent posting of the docket entry does not appear to indicate any nefarious action. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
To give one example from the Ninth Circuit: The plaintiffs in this case previously were denominated "James Rowe, Jane Rowe and John Doe. [read post]
23 May 2023, 2:57 pm by centerforartlaw
At nearly 94 years of age, Kusama is widely acknowledged as one of the most accomplished living artists.[1] Renowned globally, she possesses a distinctive and captivating visual style that has mesmerized audiences. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
The article explains that although the CJEU held that infringement of the GDPR does not automatically give rise to a right to compensation, there is no threshold of seriousness for non-material damage suffered that is required to seek compensation. [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:41 pm
   One City, Two Legal Systems: Hong Kong Judges’ Role in Rights Violations under the National Security Law May 10, 2023 Introduction (PDF) Since the National People’s Congress Standing Committee of the People’s Republic of China imposed the National Security Law[1] on Hong Kong three years ago, authorities have used it to crack down on … [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22 Maclennan v… [read post]