Search for: "Jennifer W. v. Michael W." Results 1 - 20 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Illegitimacy October 10, 2022 | Eric W. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Julie Suk and Caroline Fredrickson are newer friends, with whom I worked (as with Mark, Steve, and Jennifer) on what I call the “Tomasky project,” a group that came together charged by Michael Tomasky, the editor of Democracy (and now, as well, The New Republic) to design a constitution that would serve us well in the 21stcentury. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:24 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The topic of the intersection between private international law and IP law is continued in Chapter 2 by Graeme W. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: intent exists as an element but not w/r/t specific works, just general intent that there will be a performance. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:51 am
Leyens (University of Bremen), on Monday, April 12, 2021 Tags: Antitakeover, Boards of Directors, Corporate purpose, EU, Germany, International governance, Mergers & acquisitions, Related party transactions, Stakeholders, Takeover defenses, UK A Living Wage: The Latest ESG Challenge For Corporate Governance Posted by Michael W. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Boston: Public Health Law Watch., Jennifer D. [read post]