Search for: "Jim Peters"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 10:28 am
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In, Nathaniel Bickley v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 10:03 am
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Tiffany Diggins v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:20 pm
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Walla Walla Community College, a PERC Examiner ruled that a college administrator was to be excluded from the bargaining unit representing rank and file higher education staff. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:06 pm
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families, a PERC Examiner dismissed a complaint alleging AFSCME breach of its duty of fair representation (DFR) when failed to facilitate a request for information. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:16 pm
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In WA Interpreters v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 pm
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In City of Seattle, [City of Seattle, Decision 137535-A (PECB, 2024)] the PERC Commission overturned an errant Examiner ruling and held that the complaining employee suffered an “adverse action” upon which a discrimination claim could be made when he was placed on administrative leave with pay pending an investigation. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
I would like to thank Jim for allowing me to publish his article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:59 pm
By Jim Cline & Peter Haller In Bethel School District, Examiner Whitney partially dismissed a complaint that alleged that the Employer had engaged in direct dealing even though it had directly proposed a plan to employees without union representation present and misreported the status of the meetings to the union. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:38 pm
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Hubert Gilmore v Teamsters 839, a Benton County corrections officer filed a ULP complaint against his Union alleging that it breached its duty of fair representation when it declined to pursue a grievance related to a newly adopted agreement that affected shift hours. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:39 am
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Maxson v Baldwin, an Ohio deputy sheriff sued his ex-Employer after he was discharged following a guilty plea to the misdemeanor of attempting to illegally fill an opioid prescription and testing positive for marijuana. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Copeland v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:31 am
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In, Town v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:22 am
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Hussey v Cambridge, a police officer sued after he was suspended for four days without pay following a Facebook post he made criticizing a police reform bill named after George Floyd. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Appeals Court Sides with Judge Who Threatened Peter Navarro with Contempt MSN – Rachel Weiner (Washington Post) | Published: 4/1/2024 A federal appeals court rejected arguments from former Trump adviser Peter Navarro, one of a series of legal losses that has the economist facing sanction for defying court orders even as he serves a four-month prison sentence for ignoring similar demands from Congress. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm
Co-moderated by Peter Lurie (Center for Science in the Public Interest) and Caitlin Boon (Mars). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:14 pm
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Noon v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:01 am
Jim Macon Bldg. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Peter Navarro Begins 4-Month Jail Sentence for Contempt of Congress DNyuz – Zach Montague and David Adams (New York Times) | Published: 3/19/2024 Peter Navarro, a trade adviser to Donald Trump, reported to federal prison, becoming the first senior Trump administration official to serve time over his role in the effort to subvert the results of the 2020 election. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
On Tuesday 20 and Wednesday 21 February 2024, the High Court heard an appeal against the 2023 decision to deny Julian Assange permission to appeal his extradition order. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:59 am
Meanwhile, detractors of the directive such as Senator Jim Risch (R-ID), the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, blasted the memorandum as “anti-Israel and calls into question the reliability of the administration. [read post]
