Search for: "John/Jane Does 1-10"
Results 1 - 20
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:23 am
Indiana Univ.: Loyola University Chicago expelled John Doe after concluding that he had engaged in sexual activity with Jane Roe, a fellow student, without her properly obtained consent. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
In 2011, she broke the stories of the Jane Does who were accusing Jeffrey Epstein of child sex trafficking. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
When the Supreme Court decided the Daubert case in June 1993, two recent verdicts in silicone-gel breast implant cases were fresh in memory.[1] The verdicts were large by the standards of the time, and the evidence presented for the claims that silicone caused autoimmune disease was extremely weak. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm
Ioannidis “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” 1 PLoS Med 8 (2005). [3] Joseph P. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:40 am
In contrast, consider a scenario where Jane and John, a couple married for 10 years, decide to separate. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 pm
Solicitation of Violation of Oath by a Public Officer (Georgia Code 16-4-7(b), 16-10-1): 12/07/2020 The next charge against Trump is Solicitation of Violation of Oath by a Public Officer (Georgia Code 16-4-7(b), 16-10-1), dated to December 7, 2020. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
To give one example from the Ninth Circuit: The plaintiffs in this case previously were denominated "James Rowe, Jane Rowe and John Doe. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:59 pm
” China previously told the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol) that John Doe #1 and Jane Doe #1 were wanted for corruption charges, and continues to maintain that this was a legitimate law enforcement operation. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm
Darth Vaughn 1:20 Welcome. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm
Greg Lambert 1:31 That’s awesome. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:02 am
Doe will file under seal within ten (10) days of the date of this Order a disclosure of the identity of any other party or entity (other than his family and Jane Roe) who may have a direct interest in the outcome of the litigation. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
" Had Plaintiff filed a complaint in which she identified herself as Jane Doe and Named Defendant as "John Doe"—i.e., providing anonymity both for herself and the accused—the Court would have granted the request for relief with little hesitation. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:35 am
To help you better understand how to complete Form 1040, we’ll use the example of John Doe and Jane Doe. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
[1] Edward S. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Jane gave birth to the child in question and placed it for adoption. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 7:11 am
She seeks to hold 73 named defendants and several Jane and John Does liable for the alleged defamation, including (1) the Times and entities and individuals associated with the Times—such as The Daily and its host; the Times's executive and business editors; and [Kashmir Hill, the author of the articles,] and her husband; (2) the alleged victims mentioned in the two articles; (3) individuals, entities, lawyers, and law firms who were involved in the… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
The verdict was a major setback for Special Counsel John Durham, who was appointed during the Trump administration and has spent three years probing whether the federal agents who investigated the 2016 Trump campaign committed wrongdoing. [read post]