Search for: "John Doe, -" Results 1 - 20 of 40,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2024, 9:54 am by John Floyd
  If Justice Alito does not voluntarily step aside as basic common sense and fairness demand, Chief Justice John Roberts should invoke Canon 2 (A) & (B) of the Supreme Court’s Code of Conduct, adopted on November 13, 2023, to remove him from any decision-making role in the cases. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm by Ronald Mann
If the trademark does contain a person’s name, and the registrant lacks that person’s consent, then the names clause prohibits registration. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Will Yeatman
His persistent and multifaceted criticisms perhaps lack collegiality, but does he have a point? [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:24 pm by Legal Profession Prof
The Idaho Supreme Court has denied an application for bar admission but will permit reapplication in two years The Idaho State Bar has filed a petition with this Court requesting permission to reject a bar application from “John Doe” and... [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“When it comes to infrastructure, we took a fresh look at our entire capital plan through a climate lens,” said John Coté, communications director. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:29 am by Evangelina Cantu
Furthermore: Nor does it suffice to say that plaintiffs can redact their communications with counsel to ensure that only non-privileged facts are disclosed. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:05 am by Beatrice Yahia
John Antczak and Jamie Ding report for AP News. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:41 am by SHG
So how does this become Roberts’ fault? [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:44 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
But the act does allow for personnel issues — like personnel performance evaluations and the like — along with legal issues to be discussed in closed sessions. [read post]
Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee expressed disappointment with Lord Sumption’s decision to “abandon his overseas colleagues. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:18 am by SHG
Does his response to Windsor prove that he abuses his role as a judge in furtherance of his personal views? [read post]