Search for: "John Doe I v. John Doe II" Results 1 - 20 of 1,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 9:30 am by Daniele Durkin
  The creators of this genAI technology were also included as John Doe defendants in the suit. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:58 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
This could be done by providing evidence that the practice: (i) does not materially degrade or threaten to materially degrade the BIAS of the general public; (ii) does not hinder consumer choice; (iii) does not impair competition, innovation, consumer demands, or investment; and (iv) does not impede any forms of expression, types of service, or points of view. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Does "landscaping" include installing an in-ground trampoline? [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am by Ilya Somin
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
Khalid Mahmood MP, Sir John Jenkins & Martyn Frampton, Policy Exchange: A definition of Islamophobia? [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
I explained that "receiving a 'political benefit' does not transform an otherwise legal action (like requesting an investigation) into an abuse of power. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
The Chief Justice does not look kindly at what Counselor to the Special Counsel, Michael R. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Following an introduction, in Part II I explicate the tort of trespass and the right to exclude at its heart. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In two of my last three Verdict columns (this one and then this one co-authored with Jason Mazzone), I have discussed—in connection with the Supreme Court’s consideration in Trump v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
In 2005, Pope Benedict “decrie[d] ‘cafeteria Catholicism,’” and cited Pope John Paul II in support of that conclusion.And now there is Biden. [read post]