Search for: "John Doe Nos. 1 through 9"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Ainda que digam respeito à origem dos fenômenos, não devem ser buscadas nos primórdios, tal como nas abordagens historicistas, mas nisso que nos é contemporâneo, que nos acompanha e cujo vigor só pode ser verdadeiramente apreendido quando está em vias de desaparecer. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free"(John 8:32 (KJV). [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
Nos. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
FIDO Alliance, Inc., Consolidated Oppositions Nos. 91225634 and 91249276 and Cancellation No. 92071706 (December 1, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
”[9] Once the nominating stockholder submits its notice, all stockholders would then have equal access on a timely basis to communications made by the nominating stockholder. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
On the general issue of reliability, Oreskes proferred an opinion that scientific research is made reliable by “the collective vetting and critical interrogation of claims through scientific workshop, meetings, conferences, and above all, publication in peer-reviewed journals, formal scientific assessments and reports of government scientific agencies and laboratories. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
The growth of private markets through exempt offerings, the ascension of the once-mythical “unicorns,” and what these things portend for the future of our public markets have been hotly debated topics for some time now.[1] Over the past decades, private securities offerings have grown at a significantly faster rate than public offerings.[2] Companies that contemplate going public are now waiting much longer to do so.[3] Others are choosing not to go public at all.[4]… [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:54 am
Patent Nos. 8,063,182 and 8,163,522. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
In 1975, the SEC found, “there [was] virtually no investor interest in voluminous information” related to climate.[9] That was true, in part, because there was no “uniform method by which the environmental effects of corporate practices may be described,” and in part because “both the costs to registrants and the administrative burdens involved . . . would be excessive. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In 2020, 165 operating companies went public via a traditional initial public offering (IPO).[1] There were a total of 248 SPAC IPOs that same year,[2] meaning roughly 60% of all IPOs were conducted through SPACs. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:37 pm
In late 2019, an outbreak of E. coli O103 in Iowa was linked to clover sprouts served at Jimmy John’s restaurants.[8] On or around December 19, 2019, Jimmy John’s, LLC was informed that sandwiches sold at its restaurants were the suspected source of the outbreak, and on December 23, 2019, Inspire Brands was contacted by the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals to inform them of the sprouts-related outbreak.[9] Neither Inspire Brands nor Jimmy… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Brennan, No. 19-5885, ECF Nos. 17-18 (E.D. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:18 am
" In re Flex Ltd., Serial Nos. 86453853 and 86493735 (December 9, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
At the time, the Company was the official pizza sponsor of the National Football League.[9] On the Earnings Call, Schnatter made the following comments:Now to the NFL. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
And when only some parties in a complex dispute over a troubled project or business deal have to arbitrate claims against each other while others do not, it creates additional problems that would otherwise be addressed through court rules governing interventions, third-party practice, and joinders. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Nos. 1-4, 16-3 at 1-6.)E. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Nos. 14-17-00483-CV, 14-17-00540-CV. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Justice O’CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This case requires us to consider to what extent the “fair use” provision of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976, (hereinafter the Copyright Act) 17 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
If an attorney or law firm has procured clients through marketing efforts that run afoul of the barratry statute, it would be in its interest to have the issued resolved in a private forum, and not create a public record, but does that advance the state's public policy? [read post]
