Search for: "John Doe v. Jane Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 461
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am by Larry
Last week, we presented the 22nd edition during which I had the opportunity to interview the Honorable Jane A. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:23 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is the issue in the 2009, San Antonio Court of Appeals opinion decided in Irwin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
CLAIMANT’S VERIFIED MOTION FOR SUMMARY FINAL ORDER WITH REGARD TO SECTION 440.13(2)(f) REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF PHYSICIAN Claimant, JANE DOE, by and through her undersigned attorney, files this, Claimant’s Verified Motion for Summary Final Order. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am by Eugene Volokh
An unincorporated association, the Concerned Jewish Parents and Teachers of Los Angeles, along with six individuals using the pseudonyms Jane or John Doe ("Doe plaintiffs") initiated this action …. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Hanner, decided last week by the Pennsylvania intermediate appellate court, in an opinion by Judge John Bender, joined by Judges Mary Jane Bowes and Megan Sullivan: The facts, as taken in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as the verdict winner, are straightforward. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Complaint identifies the Parties with pseudonyms—"John Doe" for Plaintiff and "Jane Roe" for Defendant…. [read post]