Search for: "Johnson Controls v. McNeil" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
May 9, 2013) (stating that the FDA’s interpretations of its own regulations promulgated under title 21 “are ‘controlling unless plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulations’ or there is any other reason to doubt that they reflect the FDA’s fair and considered judgment”) (citing and quoting PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Wyeth, Inc., ___ N.W.2d ___, 2014 WL 3377071 (Iowa July 11, 2014), but Huck isn’t even the last  case on our scorecard any longer – that honor currently belongs to Johnson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Civ. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  A control group of randomly selected internet users. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm by Michelle Yeary
  It’s a Tylenol case and the Tylenol in question was produced by a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, McNeil-PPC, Inc. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:24 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
That didn’t matter much to Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, which: [P]romoted the sale of Topamax for off-label psychiatric uses through a practice known as the “Doctor-for-a-Day” program. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:52 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas's dissent in Virginia v. [read post]