Search for: "Johnson v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y."
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Meadow Union Free School Dist., 89 AD3d 1030; Matter of Hegarty v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 5 AD3d 771). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Meadow Union Free School Dist., 89 AD3d 1030; Matter of Hegarty v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 5 AD3d 771). [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:39 am
Alleged abolishment of positions in violation of a provision in a CBA held to be subject to grievance arbitrationMatter of Johnson City Professional Firefighters Local 921 v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 02890, Decided on April 8, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentSupreme Court, Broome County, denied the Village of Johnson City’s petition to stay arbitration between the parties concerning the Village’s… [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:44 am
The case is Johnson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm
Feb. 1, 2012, posted online Feb. 7); the last three paragraphs, which discuss free-speech-related factors as to the magnitude of the penalty, are particularly interesting, though debatable: In 1995, petitioner, a tenured teacher, began working for respondent New York City ]Department of Education (DOE). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm
Feb. 1, 2012, posted online Feb. 7); the last three paragraphs, which discuss free-speech-related factors as to the magnitude of the penalty, are particularly interesting, though debatable: In 1995, petitioner, a tenured teacher, began working for respondent New York City ]Department of Education (DOE). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
254, Decision No. 15,851; Appeal of Johnson, 46 id. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
254, Decision No. 15,851; Appeal of Johnson, 46 id. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:15 am
"Court of Appeals holds that a “residency policy” requiring municipal workers to be domiciled within the geographical boundaries of the jurisdiction serves a "legitimate purpose"Matter of Beck-Nichols, Adrian, and Luchey v Bianco, 2013 NY Slip Op 01015, Court of Appeals The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2013/2013_01015.htmEmployee terminated after failing to establish and maintain a domicile in the… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Johnson; (4) Jesus Land: A Memoir by Julia Scheeres; and (5) Red Hood by Elana K. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Johnson; (4) Jesus Land: A Memoir by Julia Scheeres; and (5) Red Hood by Elana K. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Plaintiff commenced this action in federal court against, among others, Miller, the police department, and the City of Binghamton (the City). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Plaintiff commenced this action in federal court against, among others, Miller, the police department, and the City of Binghamton (the City). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]