Search for: "Johnson v. Employment Dept." Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Johnson, which has gained some media attention. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Title VI Legal Manual (Updated), Section X—Employment Coverage. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 25 July 2022, there were hearings in MBR Acres Limited v FREE THE MBR BEAGLES before Nicklin J and in TJM -v- Chief Constable of West Yorkshire before Johnson J. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The evidence established, prima facie, that the underlying accident was related to a risk shared by the general public, as opposed to a special hazard connected to the plaintiff’s employment (see Matter of Husted v Seneca Steel Serv., 41 NY2d 140, 144; Matter of Johnson v New York City Tr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Under the facts and circumstances presented, it found no abuse of discretion in Supreme Courts determination to, effectively, adjust the equitable distribution award to reflect an excessive temporary maintenance award (see Johnson v. [read post]