Search for: "Johnson v. Schultz"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:02 am
Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and former Rep. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Johnson (1989) Frisby v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
On 12 October 2022, a statement was read in settlement of Mincione v RCS Media Group. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 5:55 am
That’s exactly what happened in Johnson v Braverman CPA PC 2020 NY Slip Op 33149(U) September 25, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650894/2020 Judge: Arlene P. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
See Bey v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 7:20 am
Anthony Johnson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
See Schultz v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
Johnson & another Whether the criminal harassment statute, G. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:57 am
For “name of author” on its application, it listed only three of many, in the form “1) Jeff Schultz 2) Chris Arend 3) Johnny Johnson & 103 others. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:45 pm
Underlying the discussion was the Fifth Circuit’s correct finding in Veeck v. [read post]
