Search for: "Johnson v. State, Civil Service Department" Results 1 - 20 of 328
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been… [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Commissioner of Corrections The commissioner of corrections is the person responsible for the administration of Minnesota’s Department of Corrections, in other words, Minnesota’s state prisons. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm by Unknown
Johnson (Criminal Jurisdiction; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
Lash's treatment of the legislative history of Section Three departs from these premises at a number of points. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Euractiv reported on the concerns raised by civil society. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another, heard 4 December 2023 (Johnson J) Wilson v Mendelsohn [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
Washington, in which the justices will consider whether a plaintiff must pursue all available administrative remedies through the state to be eligible to bring a federal civil rights claim; and Department of State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
United States and then again in the 1990 decision, Employment Div. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm by Josh Blackman
Johnson (1866), the Supreme Court observed that "the President is the executive department. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
In this review, we use several sources for the cohort: (1) the civil business-fraud case brought against Trump, his family members, and his businesses by the New York Attorney General; (2) the 2020 “Kraken” King v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
It includes provisions for digital verification services and the flow of personal data for law enforcement and national security purposes. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was an appeal hearing before Johnson J in the case of Edwards v Okeke KA-2023-000070. [read post]