Search for: "Jones v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Target Group Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th July 2023. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
Commissioner,[28] the court found that the taxpayer was violating the no private benefits provision when it primarily served one political party over the other, and the evidence lacked in trying to be nonpartisan. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Brake and another v Chedington Court Estate Ltd, heard 1st November 2022 Barton and others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn–Jones, heard 3rd November 2022. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am by Matrix Law
Brake and another v Chedington Court Estate Ltd, heard 1st November 2022 Barton and others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn–Jones, heard 3rd November 2022. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Brake and another v Chedington Court Estate Ltd, heard 1st November 2022 Barton and others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn–Jones, heard 3rd November 2022. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Brake and another v Chedington Court Estate Ltd, heard 1st November 2022 Barton and others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn–Jones, heard 3rd November 2022. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 21-379, which has been rescheduled twice. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The second is Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v London Clubs Management Ltd. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Second, issues arising out of the case of Prudential Assurance Company Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 39. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 02 and Tuesday 03 November, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Reed and Lord Lloyd-Jones gave the judgment, with whom all members of the Court agreed. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 Jun 2019. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
Internal Revenue Service is a good example of this approach. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and to “clarify that no agency may use presumptions to penalize actions that are authorized by the express terms of that agency’s own regulations. [read post]