Search for: "Jones v. Black*" Results 1 - 20 of 846
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 13 June 2024, there were hearings in Nicholas James Gwilliam v (1) Stephen Thomas Freeman (2) John William Freeman QB-2021-000981 and Tyndal v Obisulu KB-2024-001333. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:43 am by Gene Takagi
Additional Resources for Context Brief of Professor Roger Colinvaux as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendants-Appellees and Affirmance: American Alliance for Equal Rights v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
IPSO 00418-24 Hedges and Baker v thesun.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 00666-24 Mitchison v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 22422-23 openDemocracy v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 21812-23 Vulliamy v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach –… [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Whereas those old WWII films are in black and white and the Nazis' extermination campaign was clinical and industrial, the October 7 pogrom was intimate and personal, often triumphantly recorded by the perpetrators themselves in HD color on their mobile phones or Go-Pros. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
On 7-8 March 2024, there was a hearing in the data protection case of Lynch v Serious Fraud Office KB-2024-000237. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
There was also a strike out application in the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]