Search for: "Jones v. Commissioner of Public Safety" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
Ofcom has also published a joint statement with the ICO about collaboration on the regulation of services that concern both online safety and data protection. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
The title is one of a number of publications and individuals to receive a letter from Wootton’s lawyers after reporting that he was the subject of a police investigation. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
In the latest Panopticon Podcast, Anya Proops KC interviews Ofcom’s Online Safety Policy Director Jon Higham about Ofcom’s new regulatory role under the Online Safety Act 2023. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
It emphasises accountability for tech companies, transparency in algorithms and enhanced safety measures. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom has issued a reminder regarding its stakeholder consultation on the code of practice under the Online Safety Act. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has released updated opinions on what online services need to do to comply with the Online Safety Act. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Clean Up the Internet blog has published an article reflecting on developments for internet safety in 2023. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Meta said in its announcement it has taken measures to ensure the safety of users, including privacy and safety controls to prevent unwanted messages. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
Briggins, 50 N.Y.2d 302, 309, 428 N.Y.S.2d 909, 406 N.E.2d 766 (1980) (concurring opinion) (Jones, J.). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The regulatory framework consists of five AI principles: safety, transparency, fairness, accountability and governance, and redress. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
Section 501 defines 501(c)(3) organizations as “… organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports competition. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
IPSO 00514-22 Kiehlmann v Scottish Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 10375-22 Jones v nottinghampost.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 12028-22 Cook v northwichguardian.co.uk, 9 Reporting of Crime (2021), 4 intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No… [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The UK Information Commissioner’s Office formally reprimanded the Secretary of State for the Home Department after sensitive reports containing personal data were found at a public venue in London in September 2021. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
The Commissioner held that section 43(2) was correctly applied and the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Information Commissioner’s Office said a breach notification was reviewed and it was determined no further action was needed. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm by INFORRM
In Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, the Court of Appeal accepted that the retention, by the police, of photographs of an activist constituted an actionable breach of the Article 8 right to privacy given the sinister overtures of state monitoring that this retention spoke to. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 30 September 2021 judgment was handed down in Kate Wilson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and National Police Chief’s Council [2021] UKIPTrib IPT/11/167/H. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  The Garda Commissioner, a non-party in the defamation case, opposed inspection, claiming public interest privilege on grounds including preserving the force’s ability to effectively investigate crime and protect informants. [read post]