Search for: "Jones v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The case concerned a medical service provider (MDK) who had processed the personal health data of an incapacitated employee and passed the information to a health insurance fund. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Bias response and the First Amendment The highest-profile case is undoubtedly Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that a group called “Feds for Medical Freedom” could challenge that requirement in federal district court, despite the provisions of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 channeling federal employees’ challenges to adverse personnel actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board, subject to review by the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
Briggins, 50 N.Y.2d 302, 309, 428 N.Y.S.2d 909, 406 N.E.2d 766 (1980) (concurring opinion) (Jones, J.). [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
E/C authorized these medical providers as primary care physicians: Port of Miami Medical Clinic/Irwin M. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
(American Express is a notable exception in that regard, as is, to some extent, Bank of America f/k/a FIA Card Services, N.A.). [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
The agreement provides that Capital One would allow Houle to purchase goods and services with credit in exchange for payment. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Three other new relists involve challenges to the Defense Department’s policy respecting transgender service members, under which those found to have gender dysphoria would generally be barred from military service: Trump v. [read post]