Search for: "Jordan v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
The shoes were filled with holy water sourced from the Jordan River and adorned with religious symbols, including a miniature crucifix and the inscription “MT. 14:25,” referencing the biblical passage describing Jesus walking on water.[20] Despite not being endorsed or made by Nike, the Jesus Shoes gained popularity and were worn by celebrities like Drake. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:00 am by Aaron Moss
You may then be wondering why I’m even including Griffin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On Wednesday 25 October 2023 there was a committal hearing in the case of Kent Police v Taylor before Steyn J. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:39 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, before Scalise and Jordan emerged as the frontrunners, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene proposed electing Trump to the Speakership. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Jim Jordan, a Systematic Disinformation Campaign, and January 6 (Aug. 23, 2021) 11. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:18 am by Jennifer Trahan
  Subsequently, in the Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:05 am by Astrid Reisinger Coracini
Most recently, in the May 2019 Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al-Bashir Appeal, the ICC’s Appeals Chamber considered Jordan’s failure to arrest then Sudanese President Al-Bashir (against whom warrants had been issued for crimes under international law), when he traveled to the territory of Jordan. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:11 am by Jennifer Trahan
Taylor, May 31, 2004 (Charles Taylor not immune from prosecution before the SLSC, even though indicted while a sitting head of state); Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al-Bashir Appeal, ICC Appeals Chamber, May 6, 2019 (“there was no Head of State immunity that would have prevented Jordan from executing the [ICC] warrant for the arrest and surrender” of then-President al-Bashir of Sudan). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Matt Gluck
  Adam Chan described the Supreme Court’s ruling in Torres v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., 958 F.3d 341, 350 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc) (Ho, J., concurring) (judges should follow legal texts "to the maximum extent that Supreme Court precedent permits") (citing Alvarez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]