Search for: "Josh Anderson" Results 1 - 20 of 228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2024, 10:17 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
(Photo by JOSH EDELSON / AFP) (Photo by JOSH EDELSON/AFP via Getty Images)CALIFORNIA, USA – MAY 11: Northern Lights (Aurora Borealis) illuminate the sky of San Francisco North Bay as seen from China Camp Beach in San Rafael, California, United States on May 11, 2024. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson, Justices Jackson and Gorsuch both asked why the President was not specifically enumerated in the list of covered offices in Section 3–those who had to take the oath and those who would be subject to disqualification. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am by Josh Blackman
For those interested in reading further, we discuss the sword-shield dichotomy in Sweeping and Forcing (pp. 389–404); see also Anderson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
An Elaborate PAC Scheme Is Helping Pay Them – for Now MSN – Erin Mansfield and Zac Anderson (USA Today) | Published: 3/24/2024 A pro-Donald Trump super PAC has been transferring millions of dollars every month to the former president’s fund for paying his legal bills. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – San Francisco’s New Ethics Watchdog Hates This Election Loophole San Francisco Standard – Josh Koehn | Published: 2/12/2024 As the new leader of the San Francisco Ethics Commission, Patrick Ford has one of the most important roles in the city, especially in an election year. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson, the Chief Justice did not seem interested in cleanly resolving the insurrection issue. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson, counsel for the voters was forced to abandon the claim that the Speaker and the Senate President Pro Tempore were "officers of the United States" whose appointments were not provided for in Article II, Section 2. [read post]