Search for: "Judge David Wecht" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2023, 7:29 am by Mark Ashton
This grew out of Justice David Wecht’s comments in C.G. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
Justice Wecht and McIntyre noted that although the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
These numerous decisions are thoroughly researched and reviewed by Judge Terrence R. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Eugene Volokh
.' " Judge Richard Posner has referred to the doctrine as a "ubiquitous oxymoron. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:54 am by Eugene Volokh
From Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice David Wecht's concurrence yesterday in Bert Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In his dissenting opinion in Gallagher and again in his concurring opinion in Donovan, Pennsylvania’s “Great Dissenter,” Justice David N. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 12:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Wecht confirmed that when the evidence in a case suggests that a motorist was faced with a sudden emergency, “the presiding judge may instruct a jury that, should it determine that such an emergency contributed to the accident, it should assess the defendant’s performance commensurately. [read post]
” In a scathing concurring statement, Justice David Wecht noted that neither this lawsuit nor the lawsuit filed by the campaign of President Donald Trump alleges that any mail-in ballots were fraudulently cast or counted, saying, “The absence of fraud allegation from this matter–not to mention actual evidence of fraud–alone is fatal to [their] claim. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Under this ruling, it will now be a trial court judge who will select the medical examiner and who will also set the parameters of the exam.In light of the Sayles decision, motor vehicle accident litigators and trial court judges can unfortunately now expect a flood of motions followed by petty litigation over the selection of an appropriate doctor and the parameters of the exam. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
This exclusion that had been routinely upheld for decades by various prior court decisions with some of those decisions even coming from the Supreme Court, was history.Indeed, even Justice David Wecht, in his dissenting opinion issued in the Sayles case reviewed below, has framed the Supreme Court’s recent jurisprudence, particularly in motor vehicle accident cases, as evidencing “freewheeling and unwarranted invocation of ‘public policy’” to change… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Feb. 19, 2018 Williamson, J.), Judge David J. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 This was a 6-1 decision with Justice David Wecht dissenting on procedural grounds.The Court delineated the specific issue before it as involving the question of when the statute of limitations begins to runs for a court action in an uninsured (UM) motorist claim arising out of an automobile insurance policy containing an arbitration agreement. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 1:18 pm by Mike Worgul
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion, which was authored by Justice David Wecht, draws upon two bodies of law: Implied Consent Statute–Pennsylvania motorists are deemed to have given consent to chemical tests when suspected of DUI. [read post]
1 May 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(mem. op. by Wecht, J.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court addressed the test of proper venue for a corporate defendant based upon the analysis of where the Defendant corporation conducted business in the Commonwealth.Judge David N. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 3:12 pm
.'" Judge David Wecht of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania has this review of Joan Biskupic's newest book in today's edition of The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:05 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Wecht, Federal Middle District Judge Malachy E. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Wecht of the Pennsylvania Superior Court, the decision of the trial court judge granting summary judgment was reversed.Judge David N. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  This situation allegedly caused the Plaintiff to have to undergo two additional surgeries to clean up the issues created by the sponge.Opinion bySuperior Court Judge David N. [read post]