Search for: "Justice Clarence Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2024, 1:38 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the court’s decision. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 10:58 am
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the court’s decision, in an opinion joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:03 am
And Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Neil M. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:44 pm
As much as I do not want Justice Clarence Thomas on the Court, I very much welcome his majority opinion on this bump stock matter, in Garland v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:55 pm
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has just adopted a legal theory that would eliminate a spate of recent lawsuits filed by groups that share the conservative justice’s opposition to race-based diversity programs. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
She indirectly challenged Justice Clarence Thomas’s view of history and his originalism in a voting rights case this term. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:29 am
The lowest ratings in this regard were Clarence Thomas (unfavorable rating of 33%); Brett Kavanaugh (unfavorable rating of 30%); and Amy Coney-Barrett (unfavorable rating of 24%). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
Buried towards the bottom of the article is some new reporting on the deliberations in Bruen: The draft opinion that Justice Clarence Thomas circulated to his colleagues in February 2022 was sweeping, with the potential to outlaw many common gun-control measures. [read post]
Supreme Court Hands a Blow to Small-Business Succession Planning in Connelly v. U.S., by Sam Sturgis
17 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm
The Court’s Decision Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Clarence Thomas sided with the IRS and held that the Company’s obligation to redeem Michael’s shares did not constitute a liability that offset the value of the life-insurance proceeds used to fulfill the redemption. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
” by Natalia Contreras (Votebeat) for MSN Ethics National: “New Documents Show Unreported Trips by Justice Clarence Thomas” by Justin Jouvenal and Tobi Raji (Washington Post) for MSN Washington: “Caught in a Crossfire. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
It did just that in 2018, when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) promulgated a regulation clarifying that henceforth the statutory definition of a machinegun would include bump stocks.On Friday of last week, the Supreme Court—in a 6-3 opinion authored by Justice Clarence Thomas—invalidated the bump stock prohibition. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:18 pm
The opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas includes extensive technical information on how the internal parts of AR-15 rifles function, including diagrams and an animated graphic showing the movement of the parts. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 6:13 pm
The latest update includes two 2019 vacations retroactively added by Justice Clarence Thomas, which were paid for by billionaire Harlan Crow and which the justice had previously failed to disclose. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:07 am
“Opinionpalooza: SCOTUS Says Yes to Bump Stocks, No to Gun Safety Regulation; Justice Clarence Thomas overturns the bump stock ban in his deadly Garland v Cargill majority opinion. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 3:27 pm
Wainwright, and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel it protects could be on the chopping block, especially with the ethically challenged Justice Clarence Thomas bearing the hatchet. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, argued that bump stocks do not make a semi-automatic rifle fire automatically as defined by law since the trigger must function separately for each round fired, contrary to the continuous firing mechanism of machine guns. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, argued that bump stocks do not make a semi-automatic rifle fire automatically as defined by law since the trigger must function separately for each round fired, contrary to the continuous firing mechanism of machine guns. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, argued that bump stocks do not make a semi-automatic rifle fire automatically as defined by law since the trigger must function separately for each round fired, contrary to the continuous firing mechanism of machine guns. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
The opinion, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, parses in a ridiculous level of detail whether bump stocks truly fit the precise mechanical definition of a machine gun. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:31 am
Justice Neil Gorsuch filed a forceful dissent, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
