Search for: "KELLY v ROSE" Results 1 - 20 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2024, 5:28 pm
Roy, (1993) 75 B.C.L.R. (2d) 213, Kelly v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Abie’s Irish Rose/The Cohens and the Kellys. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altshcul 2022 NY Slip Op 34430(U) December 30, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 104202/2011 Judge: Kelly A. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
“Public museums are committed to spreading knowledge and to making their collections accessible,”[4] and as stay-at-home orders tested this commitment, museums around the world rose to the challenge. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
Here is how Judge Weinstein described the event: “But what I did may have been even worse [than Judge Kelly’s conduct that led to his disqualification]. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), however, involving an alleged rap parody of the popular song “Pretty Woman”: [W]e reject Acuff-Rose’s argument that 2 Live Crew’s request for permission to use the original should be weighed against a finding of fair use. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
• Peter De Rose, 73, of Austin, died January 21, 2021. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “Schrems II judgement due in July – what this might mean for your outsourcing deal”. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am by MOTP
Mendoza, Appellee.Appeal from the 21st District Court of Bastrop County, No. 174-21, the Honorable Carson Talmadge Campbell, Judge Presiding.Affirmed.Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith.MEMORANDUM OPINIONCHARI L. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Acuff Rose had lots of changes to the work and explicit critical stance v. original—the only reason the Sixth Circuit held not fair use was the prejudices of old white men. [read post]