Search for: "Kay v. Brown" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
No. 66746/01 as interpreted by Lord Brown in Kay at [210]). [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:01 am by Bridget Crawford
Congratulations to Professor Blair LM Kelley (History, North Carolina) who has received the 2010 Letitia Woods Brown Memorial Book Award from the Association of Black Women Historians for her book, Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:13 pm
Lord Brown suggests, that he public law defence will succeed. [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:39 am by GGCSMB&R
The existence of triable issues of fact in the defendants' moving papers precludes a finding that they established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law sufficient to eliminate any material issues of fact (see Brown v Outback Steakhouse, 39 AD3d 450, 451; Gray v South Nassau Communities Hosp., 245 AD2d 337; Muscatello v City of New York, 215 AD2d 463, 464). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
The judgment handed down yesterday, Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) was a public judgment and was said to be expressed in muted or anodyne terms by the Lord  Justice Maurice Kay. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
I draw attention also to paragraph 54 of Lord Hope’s speech, and the importance of the claimant authority justifying its decision to seek possession, and to his reference to Lord Brown’s concerns.. 57. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
In Kay, Lord Brown expressly stated that Connors could been argued as an “unfairness” challenge in the domestic courts and in Doherty, Lord Hope makes clear that the challenges are not confined to Wednesbury grounds. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am by Eric Goldman
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
Harvie Wilkinson penned the opinion for the unanimous panel, which also included Judge Diana Gribbon Motz and Judge Allyson Kay Duncan. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The trial judge did not exclude the surveillance evidence under rule 30.08, nor did he assess its relevance and require the respondents to comply strictly with the rule in Browne v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court followed the clear ruling by the House of Lords in Kay v London Borough of Lambeth [2006] AC 465 that domestic rules of precedent applied. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]