Search for: "Kennedy v. Novo A/S" Results 1 - 20 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Reading the blog and media reaction to Judge Reinhardt’s opinion for the Ninth Circuit in Perry v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:51 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
This morning I attended the Supreme Court argument in Teva v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:06 pm
 In reaching this conclusion, the Federal Circuit reviewed de novo all aspects of the District Court’s claim construction, including the District Court’s determination of subsidiary facts. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Ronald Mann
When Mark Perry rose on behalf of Novo, he went straight to Justice Kennedys point, arguing that the use codes are in truth written by the FDA, and thus that the only sensible remedy is litigation against the FDA. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 8:00 pm by Howard Friedman
 At issue is whether a district court’s decision to quash or enforce an EEOC subpoena should be reviewed de novo, or whether an appellate court should instead give more deference to the district court's decision. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:47 pm by Kent Scheidegger
    From pp. 20-21 of the transcript:JUSTICE KENNEDY: But if it's a new claim, then if -- we don't look to (d) because it wasn't adjudicated on the merits.MR. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:02 pm
Kennedy, 131 F.3d 1371, 1376 (10th Cir.1997) (citing Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56); see United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:49 pm
Leatherman Tool (2001) (the judicial review of jury verdicts awarding punitives must be "de novo"); State Farm v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
Both Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy, concurring in the judgment, offered critics of the ban a bit of a silver lining: The justices sought to nudge the president toward more civil rhetoric and overruled Korematsu v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Treated the Plaintiff's petition as one which transferred the matter to the Appellate Division for de novo review pursuant to CPLR 7804(g); and3. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Treated the Plaintiff's petition as one which transferred the matter to the Appellate Division for de novo review pursuant to CPLR 7804(g); and3. [read post]