Search for: "Kennedy v. Schultz" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
The Jury Is Still Out on One-In-One-Out February 3, 2020 | Elizabeth Golberg, Harvard Kennedy School’s Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government There are undoubtedly outdated laws on the statute books. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am by Jeff Gamso
Kennedy, lately the court’s swing justice, who replaced Justice Powell. [read post]