Search for: "King v. Loya*"
Results 1 - 20
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:51 am
Ayromlooi v Staten Is. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign states,… [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
Este nuevo convenio logra un respetuoso entendimiento y reafirma nuestros lazos históricos, protegiendo diferentes puntos de interés común para ambas instituciones religiosas, con cuyo hermanamiento, da continuidad a nuestros vínculos anteriormente suscritos y deja indisolublemente ligado a dos cultos con raíces y prácticas muy cercanas con origenes africanos. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The threshold of seriousness Master Bell reflected upon two notable cases, Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
[Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case] This week amicus briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
King v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In Chisholm v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
In Addington v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm
Quick links Harriet Gray, Lexology: Balancing beliefs in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Funk v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
What they wanted was freedom from parliamentary control—the “sovereignty” of the “King in Parliament”—and genuine self-government. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
[9] See, e.g., Geoffrey Sawer, Modern Federalism 1 –2 (1969); Ivo Duchacek, Comparative Federalism 207 –08 (1970); Preston King, Federalism and Federation 60 (! [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 pm
" Most recently, on Saturday (in response to a Slashdot posting related to the latest revelation from Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
First, legislative measures like the DMA, regulatory intervention such as the ongoing DG COMP investigation of the Google Play Store, and litigation (in less than a week, the Ninth Circuit will hear Epic v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:11 pm
Apple over Apple Pay and access to the iPhone's NFC chipTwo weeks ago, Apple moved to dismiss the Affinity Credit Union v. [read post]
