Search for: "King v. Meyer"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 10:04 am
*CIRCUIT COURTGroup 8 (Judge David Miller retiring)Jason Bloch v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:18 pm
” Meyer v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
But in King v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Or click here for a nice little article on the exciting backstory to Meyer v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 4:33 am
See Kaley v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:30 am
In Meyers v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
Publicity Rights The court says the parties agree that someone violated Urban Meyer’s personality rights (apparently assigned to OSU) by selling items on Redbubble. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Andrew King It’s Saturday. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
In NAACP v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
In NAACP v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 2:52 am
King, agreeing to review a split decision from the Sixth Circuit (then styled King v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
Meyer (1940) 311 U.S. 457, 463). [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:47 am
The implication being if those pesky artists would just use the tools YouTube provides, there would be peace in the valley with sunshine, gum drops and puppy dog tails for everyone with happiness among the subjects of the Unicorn Kings. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:04 am
Defendant Mintzer, Sarowitz, Zeris, Ledva & Meyers, LLP (Mintzer) briefly represented the plaintiff Billiard Balls Management (Billiard Balls) in an underlying action in Kings County, Gershman v Ahmad (index No. 18893/12) (the Gershman matter, or the underlying action), where the plaintiff Lizaveta Gershman (Gershman) alleged that Billiard Balls was liable under the Dram Shop Act. [read post]
